Potential UNEP treaty language could impact vaccines
Posted by: rachelhampton | 09/26/2011
This is a guest blog by Erin Fry, Government Affairs Officer of PATH.
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is supporting the development of a treaty on mercury which may include language that impacts access to vaccines in poor countries.
Thiomersal (which also goes by the name thimerosal) is a key preservative that contains small amounts of ethylmercury and is used in most multi-dose vaccines to prevent bacterial and fungal growth in vaccine vials. It can be found in vaccines for major killers of infants and children like tetanus and pertussis, as well as hepatitis B, rabies, influenza, and meningococcal diseases.
Although data from many studies show no convincing evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thiomersal in vaccines, the UNEP International Negotiating Committee (INC) has added pharmaceutical products, including vaccines, to a draft list of mercury-added products to be banned in its most recent draft.
Over the past ten years, reputable scientific bodies have evaluated the safety of thiomersal. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety concludes that existing thiomersal-containing vaccines are safe and that any risks are unproven. Similar conclusions have been drawn by the US Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the UK Committee on Safety of Medicines, and the European Medicines Agency.
The implications of restricting the manufacture, distribution, or use of thiomersal could significantly limit access to several lifesaving vaccines in poor countries. According toWHO, making vaccines thiomersal-free would require using either:
an alternative preservative (which would require costly and time-consuming clinical studies, thereby driving up the cost of the vaccines); or
preservative-free single-dose vaccines exclusively (which would considerably increase costs and require twice the storage and transport capacity, an impossibility for most countries).
Neither of these scenarios is desirable, particularly given that there is no evidence to suggest that removing thiomersal from vaccines would result in a positive health impact.
The treaty is under the auspices of environmental entities, and the global health community is just beginning to engage. Civil society organizations are invited to formally submit comments to the UNEP; however, the majority of health-relatedcomments submitted to date reflect inaccurate scientific information and suggest that thiomersal should not be used in vaccines.
Posted by: rachelhampton | 09/26/2011
This is a guest blog by Erin Fry, Government Affairs Officer of PATH.
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is supporting the development of a treaty on mercury which may include language that impacts access to vaccines in poor countries.
Thiomersal (which also goes by the name thimerosal) is a key preservative that contains small amounts of ethylmercury and is used in most multi-dose vaccines to prevent bacterial and fungal growth in vaccine vials. It can be found in vaccines for major killers of infants and children like tetanus and pertussis, as well as hepatitis B, rabies, influenza, and meningococcal diseases.
Although data from many studies show no convincing evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thiomersal in vaccines, the UNEP International Negotiating Committee (INC) has added pharmaceutical products, including vaccines, to a draft list of mercury-added products to be banned in its most recent draft.
Over the past ten years, reputable scientific bodies have evaluated the safety of thiomersal. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety concludes that existing thiomersal-containing vaccines are safe and that any risks are unproven. Similar conclusions have been drawn by the US Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the UK Committee on Safety of Medicines, and the European Medicines Agency.
The implications of restricting the manufacture, distribution, or use of thiomersal could significantly limit access to several lifesaving vaccines in poor countries. According toWHO, making vaccines thiomersal-free would require using either:
an alternative preservative (which would require costly and time-consuming clinical studies, thereby driving up the cost of the vaccines); or
preservative-free single-dose vaccines exclusively (which would considerably increase costs and require twice the storage and transport capacity, an impossibility for most countries).
Neither of these scenarios is desirable, particularly given that there is no evidence to suggest that removing thiomersal from vaccines would result in a positive health impact.
The treaty is under the auspices of environmental entities, and the global health community is just beginning to engage. Civil society organizations are invited to formally submit comments to the UNEP; however, the majority of health-relatedcomments submitted to date reflect inaccurate scientific information and suggest that thiomersal should not be used in vaccines.
Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:31 am by Dr Abdul Aziz Awan
» Video for our MPH colleagues. Must watch
Sun Aug 07, 2022 11:56 pm by The Saint
» Salam
Sun Jan 31, 2021 7:40 am by mr dentist
» Feeling Sad
Tue Feb 04, 2020 8:27 pm by mr dentist
» Look here. Its 2020 and this is what we found
Mon Jan 27, 2020 7:23 am by izzatullah
» Sad News
Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:17 am by ameen
» Pakistan Demographic Profile 2018
Fri May 18, 2018 9:42 am by Dr Abdul Aziz Awan
» Good evening all fellows
Wed Apr 25, 2018 10:16 am by Dr Abdul Aziz Awan
» Urdu Poetry
Sat Apr 04, 2015 12:28 pm by Dr Abdul Aziz Awan